
Once a tumor or growth has been treated or removed by any method, both the surgeon (who should fully inform patient) and the patient must decide what to do with the hole or defect that remains. For example, if the wound is left to "heal by itself", the wound will ooze and may need cleaning for months, depending on the size. Letting a wound heal by itself usually results a large volume of scar. The author rarely uses this method because of these pitfalls.
Next, we will discuss side-to-side closure, flaps and grafts. These closure methods usually require no care after one to two weeks. The Web site author prefers to sew the vast majority of all defects for faster healing and best cosmetic appearance.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
One method of closure includes the ELLIPSE, otherwise
known as side-to-side closure. Take, for example, tumor A of hole B (if the
tumor was not removed by Mohs microsurgery) below:

Note that the arrows represent the 3mm margins around the tumor. See Tumor
in the glossary.
If we put stitches in positions C, D, E, F to try to close the defect, standing cones (dog or pig ears) G and H result and will stick out for many years, as shown in I. But cutting out wings I or K, as shown in L, which are each roughly as long as defect B is wide, as shown in M, produces a long line N. Note that N is at least five times as long as the tumor and at least three times as long as the defect was wide; this is the biggest disadvantage of this technique. One advantage is cost. This method is usually relatively inexpensive when compared to other tumor removal techniques. These facts can be independently confirmed by examining a page of text from a plastic-surgery textbook.
![]() |
![]() |
Typical tumor A, results in defect B. Cut O is followed
by deeper tissue lifting (cross hatched), creating loose flap P. Flap P is easily
sewn by stitches Q to make the final scar R. The advantage of a flap is that
the scar is much shorter than the side-to-side method. In addition, the scar
is broken or bent, which is less noticeable to the human eye.
GRAFTS may require the most time and patience. Grafts are used when there is no adjacent skin to flap next to the defect, or when the flap would distort body parts or be to large for practicality. With a graft, tissue is removed completely from a preferably hidden donor site, usually behind or in front of the ear or neck or from the groin, and transplanted onto the hole defect, frequently on the lip or tip of the nose. The author has had much success with grafts. However, graft disadvantages include a second donor wound and the time needed for the graft's color and texture to match the surrounding skin.
.
A skin graft is a piece of skin that has been
completely removed from one area on the body, the DONOR site, and moved to another
entirely separate area, the RECIPIENT site. The graft is usually needed and
placed in an area that has just had a deep growth or cancer removed, a place
where adjacent (touching) skin is not sufficient or stretchable enough to cover
or pull over the area in question. A graft may be likened to a piece of sod
(square of grass). Once the graft is removed for transplantation, it is very
fragile and may easily be killed. Just like a new piece of sod, the skin graft
will try to send down new "roots" (tiny microscopic blood vessels) during the
first week. A graft has just enough stored energy to send roots down only once.
One instance of shearing, rubbing or bumping to a new skin graft is just like
having a child run over a piece of sod. The tiny roots may be torn, and the
skin graft or piece of sod, as the case may be, will DIE because it does not
have enough stored energy to send roots down again.
The author has a success rate approaching 100% with his grafting techniques and prefers to place a mineral-oil-greased cotton ball (the BOLUS), tied down by stitches, for seven days over the skin-recipient site. To most doctors, success in grafting occurs when most of the graft "takes" or lives. The author believes that graft success should be measured by complete survival of 100% of the graft and patient satisfaction with the blending of the new and nearby tissues. Patients are advised not to disturb, cut, manipulate, pull or touch the bolus for one week, but just to drip mineral oil on the bolus with an eyedropper.
The disadvantage of a skin graft is that the moved tissue may not appear exactly the same as the tissue that surrounds the defect. There is usually a slight mismatch, but this may be made less obvious with the use of dermabrasion (sanding) or laser abrasion. Often the skin grafted from a site such as the fold of a collarbone or behind the ear may have LESS sun damage than the sun-damaged tissue near the area that has just borne a skin cancer. In a typical case, the more pristine (sun-protected) tissue that has been grafted may be noticeable against a backdrop of the remaining elastic-sun-damaged tissue on the nose (sun damaged skin being a prime location for the formation of skin cancers). The author has developed a method called "graft-electrodotting" that uses an electric instrument to make artificial pores in newly grafted tissue. Graft-electrodotting often improves a tissue match on highly porous recipient sites such as the nose. The procedures just mentioned help to blend the skin zones between damaged and undamaged, thick and thin, with and without glands, etc.
| Paul
J. Weber, M.D., P.A. 5353 North Federal Highway, Suite 400 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308 Tel: 954-489-9800 | Fax: 954-489-0401 |
© 1997-2003, Paul J. Weber, M.D., P.A., All
Rights Reserved